Google and its partners company that makes the
android phones have defeated many contenders that have filed the lawsuit against
Google and also have claimed that the Android has put the world to risk because
the Google don’t care about fraud prevention techniques but a panel of three
judge in the country’s top level court have said that the Android haven’t
violated any rule or anything of Gemalto, which is French Security firm. Yesterday
a document from the federal court has put the 4 year long battle to an end the
Gemalto file a case against Google, Samsung, HTC and Motorola in Eastern Districts
of Texas with claim that Android phones have memory utilization feature that it
had developed first in Austin research center. Gemalto’s invention will allow
low power devices to run high level programming languages and it accuses
several companies about violation of the patents. The companies have
successfully argued that their Smartphone didn’t violated any patents because they’re
not “Resource constrained devices” as Gemalto says in patents but they are “Rely
on off chip memory to run java programs”
“It's
fairly unusual that Gemalto lost on a summary judgment ruling at
all. Summary judgment is when judges rule on a case without a jury
trial because they believe the case can be resolved solely on a legal basis,
without any need for the kind of fact-finding involved with a jury
trial. Such rulings are fairly common in patent cases, but not in the Eastern
District of Texas, where judges prefer to refer litigants to a jury
trial.” Read More at arstechnica
In defense, Gemalto said that the Android
phone uses their technology when they “temporarily load the program from off
chip to On-Chip cache memory right prior of execution” but luckily the court
argued that the Cache memory is something that is totally different from the
main memory but not sufficient for infringement purpose.
No comments:
Post a Comment